Seal

Office of the Attorney General
State of Texas


 

November 14, 1980

Honorable Wilhelmina Delco
State Representative
House of Representatives
P. O. Box 2910
Austin, Texas 78769

Opinion No. MW-273

Re: Whether schools listed in article VII, section 17 of the Texas Constitution are prohibited from receiving appropriations from general revenues for construction

Dear Ms. Delco:

You ask whether the seventeen schools in article VII, section 17 of the Texas Constitution are prohibited from receiving appropriations from general revenues for the purposes set out in that constitutional provision. This question arises because the legislature reduced to .0001% the assessment ratio for the ad valorem tax levied by article VII, section 17 of the constitution. Prop. Tax Code s 26.03. This ratio will generate less than $200 per year for the fund supporting seventeen eligible universities. See Attorney General Opinion MW-147 (1980). You do not inquire about and we do not address the constitutionality of the state assessment ratio.

The tax levied by article VII, section 17 provides funds for acquiring, constructing and initially equipping buildings or other permanent improvements at the following institutions of higher education:

Arlington State College at Arlington

Texas Technological College at Lubbock

North Texas State University at Denton

Lamar State College of Technology at Beaumont

Texas College of Arts and Industries at Kingsville

Texas Woman's University at Denton

Texas Southern University at Houston

Midwestern University at Wichita Falls

University of Houston at Houston

Pan American College at Edinburg

East Texas State College at Commerce

Sam Houston State Teachers College at Huntsville

Southwest Texas State College at San Marcos

West Texas State University at Canyon

Stephen F. Austin State College at Nacogdoches

Sul Ross State College at Alpine

Angelo State College at San Angelo

The constitution provides that the funds generated by the tax are to be allocated to these institutions for the twelve-year period beginning January 1, 1966, and for succeeding ten-year periods. A complex formula is provided for the allocation of the tax revenues during each ten-year period. During the first year of each ten-year period, the comptroller is to allocate 85% of funds derived from the tax during that period to the eligible state institutions then in existence. During the sixth year, he is to allocate the remaining 15% to eligible state institutions then in existence. See Attorney General Opinion H-1129 (1978). 'All such designated institutions of higher learning shall not thereafter receive any general revenue funds for the acquiring or constructing of buildings or other permanent improvements for which said . . . ad valorem tax is herein provided except in case of fire, flood, storm, or earthquake occurring at any such institution. . . .' Tex. Const. art. VII, s 17. (Emphasis added).

We believe the quoted language means that institutions receiving allocations for any ten-year period may not receive general revenue funds for construction for the same ten-year period. The comptroller has a ministerial duty to allocate the available funds. See Attorney General Opinion H-1129 (1978). Even though only a small amount of money is available for allocation, the clear language of article VII, section 17, denies general revenue construction funds to universities participating in that allocation. See Carpenter v. Sheppard, 145 S.W. 2d 562 (Tex. 1940).

SUMMARY

Institutions which participate in the allocation of funds under article VII, section 17 of the Texas Constitution may not receive general revenue funds for construction for the same ten-year period.

      Very truly yours,

      White signature

      Mark White
      Attorney General of Texas

      John W. Fainter, Jr.
      First Assistant Attorney General

      Richard E. Gray III
      Executive Assistant Attorney General

      Prepared by Susan Garrison
      Assistant Attorney General


Texas OAG home page | Opinions & Open Government