Click for home page
Office of the ATTORNEY GENERAL
GREG ABBOTT
image
 

December 4, 2002

Mr. J. David Dodd, III
Nichols, Jackson, Dillard, Hager & Smith
1800 Lincoln Plaza
500 North Akard
Dallas, Texas 75201

OR2002-6896

Dear Mr. Dodd:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 173679.

The City of Allen (the "city"), which you represent, received a request for criminal history record information for three named individuals. You claim that the requested information is excepted from disclosure under section 552.101 of the Government Code. We have considered the exception you claim and reviewed the submitted information.

We note that you have only submitted information regarding one of the three named individuals. Further, you have not indicated that information regarding the other two individuals does not exist or that you wish to withhold any such information from disclosure. Therefore, to the extent information regarding the other two named individuals exists, we assume that you have released it to the requestor. If you have not released any such information, you must release it to the requestor at this time. See Gov't Code 552.301(a), .302. Because you have not submitted this information, we have no basis for finding it confidential. See Gov't Code 552.352. Thus, we have no choice but to order any such information released, to the extent it exists, per section 552.302 of the Government Code. If you believe any such information is confidential and may not lawfully be released, you must challenge this decision in court as outlined below.

We will now address the applicability of your claimed exception to the submitted information. Section 552.101 excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Section 552.101 encompasses common-law privacy. Where an individual's criminal history information has been compiled by a governmental entity, the information takes on a character that implicates the individual's right to privacy. See United States Dep't of Justice v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). In this instance, the requestor asks for all information concerning three named individuals. In this case, we believe that the right to privacy of the individual whose information you have submitted for our review has been implicated. Thus, where this named individual is a possible suspect, we conclude that the city must withhold this information under common-law privacy as encompassed by section 552.101 of the Government Code. See id.

To summarize, we conclude that (1) to the extent information regarding the two named individuals for whom you did not submit any information exists, such information must be released to the requestor; and (2) the submitted information must be withheld under section 552.101 in conjunction with the common-law right to privacy.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. 552.321(a).

If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, within 10 calendar days of this ruling, the governmental body will do one of the following three things: 1) release the public records; 2) notify the requestor of the exact day, time, and place that copies of the records will be provided or that the records can be inspected; or 3) notify the requestor of the governmental body's intent to challenge this letter ruling in court. If the governmental body fails to do one of these three things within 10 calendar days of this ruling, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at 877/673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. 552.3215(e).

If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. 552.321(a); Texas Department of Public Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408,411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ).

Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the Texas Building and Procurement Commission at 512/475-2497.

If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. We note that a third party may challenge this ruling by filing suit seeking to withhold information from a requestor. Gov't Code 552.325. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling.

Sincerely,

Karen A. Eckerle
Assistant Attorney General
Open Records Division
KAE/sdk
Ref: ID# 173679
Enc: Submitted documents

c: Mr. Gary Moses
c/o J. David Dodd, III
Nichols, Jackson, Dillard, Hager & Smith
1800 Lincoln Plaza
500 North Akard
Dallas, Texas 75201
(w/o enclosures)


 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs