Click for home page Office of the Attorney General - State of Texas
John Cornyn
image
 

August 15, 2000

Mr. Joe De Los Santos
Walsh, Anderson, Brown, Schulze & Aldridge, P.C.
Attorneys At Law
P O Box 460606
San Antonio, Texas 78246-0606

OR2000-3109

Dear Mr. De Los Santos:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 138027.

The Southside Independent School District (the "district"), which you represent, received a request for information relating to incidents in which students brought weapons to school, including "the specific date of the offense, the age of the child, the type of weapon, what happened during the incident and the punishment the child received." You claim that the requested information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101 and 552.114 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information.

We first note that the district received the request for information on May 18, 2000. You requested a decision from this office on June 9, 2000. You acknowledge that the district failed to request a decision within the ten business days required by section 552.301(b) of the Government Code. When a governmental body fails to request a decision within ten business days of receiving a request for information, the information at issue is presumed to be subject to required public disclosure. Gov't Code 552.302; Hancock v. State Bd. of Ins., 797 S.W.2d 379 (Tex. App.--Austin 1990, no writ); City of Houston v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., 673 S.W.2d 316, 323 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, no writ); Open Records Decision No. 319 (1982). Information that is presumed public must be released unless a governmental body demonstrates a compelling reason to withhold the information that is sufficient to overcome this presumption. See Hancock, 797 S.W.2d at 381-82 (governmental body must make compelling demonstration to overcome presumption of openness pursuant to statutory predecessor to Gov't Code 552.302).

The exceptions you raise may provide compelling reasons to overcome the presumption of openness. Section 552.101 of the Government Code protects "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." This section encompasses information made confidential by statute outside the Public Information Act. Some of the information responsive to the request may be excepted from disclosure under the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 ("FERPA"), 20 U.S.C. 1232g, or section 552.114 of the Government Code. FERPA provides that no federal funds will be made available under any applicable program to an educational agency or institution that releases personally identifiable information, other than directory information, contained in a student's education records to anyone but certain enumerated federal, state, and local officials and institutions, unless otherwise authorized by the student's parent. See 20 U.S.C. 1232g(b)(1); see also 34 C.F.R. 99.3 (defining personally identifiable information). Section 552.026 of the Government Code incorporates FERPA into chapter 552 of the Government Code. See Open Records Decision No. 634 at 6-8 (1995). Section 552.026 provides as follows:

This chapter does not require the release of information contained in education records of an educational agency or institution, except in conformity with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, Sec. 513, Pub. L. No. 93-380, 20 U.S.C. Sec. 1232g.

Gov't Code 552.026. "Education records" under FERPA are those records that contain information directly related to a student and that are maintained by an educational agency or institution or by a person acting for such agency or institution. See 20 U.S.C. 1232g(a)(4)(A). Information must be withheld from required public disclosure under FERPA only to the extent "reasonable and necessary to avoid personally identifying a particular student." See Open Records Decision Nos. 332 at 3 (1982), 206 at 2 (1978).

Section 552.114(a) of the Government Code requires that the district withhold "information in a student record at an educational institution funded wholly or partly by state revenue." Gov't Code 552.114(a). This office generally has treated "student record" information under section 552.114(a) as the equivalent of "education record" information that is protected by FERPA. See Open Records Decision No. 634 at 5 (1995). Therefore, you must redact from the submitted student records all student names and other information tending to identify students, such as parents' names, home addresses, physical descriptions of the students, birth dates, and documents handwritten by students.

We note, however, that a "student record" does not include "records maintained by a law enforcement unit of the educational agency or institution that were created by that law enforcement unit for the purpose of law enforcement[.]" 20 U.S.C. 1232g(a)(4)(B)(ii); see also Open Records Decision No. 612 (1992). The offense and incident reports submitted, created by the district's police department, are not protected by FERPA or by section 552.114.

However, in this instance, portions of the requested information are confidential under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 51.14(d) or 58.007(c) of the Family Code. Prior to its repeal by the Seventy-fourth Legislature, section 51.14(d) of the Family Code provided for the confidentiality of juvenile law enforcement records. Law enforcement records pertaining to conduct occurring before January 1, 1996, are governed by the former section 51.14(d), which was continued in effect for that purpose. Act of May 27, 1995, 74th Leg., R.S., ch. 262, 100, 1995 Tex. Gen. Laws 2517, 2591 (Vernon). This office concluded in 1996 that section 58.007 of the Family Code, as enacted by the Seventy-fourth Legislature, does not make confidential juvenile law enforcement records relating to conduct that occurred on or after January 1, 1996. Open Records Decision No. 644 (1996). The Seventy-fifth Legislature, however, amended section 58.007 to once again make juvenile law enforcement records confidential, effective September 1, 1997. Act of June 2, 1997, 75th Leg., R.S., ch. 1086, 20, 1997 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 4179, 4187 (Vernon). It chose not to make that amendment retroactive in application. Consequently, law enforcement records pertaining to juvenile conduct that occurred between January 1, 1996, and September 1, 1997, are not subject to the confidentiality provisions of either the former section 51.14(d) or the current section 58.007 of the Family Code. Under sections 51.14(d) and 58.007, law enforcement records concerning a child are confidential. Law enforcement records concerning a child relate to acts committed by a person who is ten years of age or older and under seventeen years of age. Fam. Code 51.02(2)(A).

Therefore, information concerning the incident that occurred in 1996 is not protected from disclosure by the Family Code both because it occurred in the gap between the applicability of sections 51.14 and 58.007, and because the student involved was no longer a child. The district must release the education records relating to that incident, with student-identifying information redacted, as we have marked. In addition, the district must release the entire offense report, unredacted. However, information concerning the incident occurring in 1999 is protected from disclosure by section 58.007. The district must withhold the law enforcement records we have labeled pursuant to section 58.007(c), but must release the remaining records with the student-identifying information redacted. Because the student-identifying information is inextricably interwoven with public information in the audio tapes submitted for our review, the district must withhold the audio tapes in their entirety.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. 552.321(a).

If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, within 10 calendar days of this ruling, the governmental body will do one of the following three things: 1) release the public records; 2) notify the requestor of the exact day, time, and place that copies of the records will be provided or that the records can be inspected; or 3) notify the requestor of the governmental body's intent to challenge this letter ruling in court. If the governmental body fails to do one of these three things within 10 calendar days of this ruling, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at 877/673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. 552.3215(e).

If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. 552.321(a); Texas Department of Public Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408,411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ).

If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling.

Sincerely,

Patricia Michels Anderson
Assistant Attorney General
Open Records Division

PMA/pr

Ref: ID# 138027

Encl. Submitted documents

cc: Ms. Brandy Ralston
KENS-TV
P O Box TV5
San Antonio, Texas 78299
(w/o enclosures)


 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs