Click for home page Office of the Attorney General - State of Texas
John Cornyn
image
 

August 17, 1999

Mr. Vernon M. Arrell
Commissioner
Texas Rehabilitation
4900 North Lamar Boulevard
Austin, Texas 78751-2399

OR99-2320

Dear Commissioner Arrell:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 126874.

The Texas Rehabilitation Commission (the "commission") received a request for "[a]ny insurance or indemnity agreements covering the acts of TRC employees during the time period of 1992 through 1998" and "Mr. Thompson's employment records." You claim that the requested documents are excepted from disclosure under section 552.103 of the Government Code. We have considered the exception you claim and reviewed a representative sample of the documents at issue.(1)

Section 552.103(a) of the Government Code excepts from disclosure information relating to litigation to which a governmental body is or may be a party. The governmental body has the burden of providing relevant facts and documents to show that section 552.103(a) is applicable in a particular situation. In order to meet this burden, the governmental body must show that (1) litigation is pending or reasonably anticipated, and (2) the information at issue is related to that litigation. University of Tex. Law Sch. v. Texas Legal Found., 958 S.W.2d 479 (Tex. App.-Austin 1997, no pet.); Heard v. Houston Post Co., 684 S.W.2d 210, 212 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Open Records Decision No. 551 at 4 (1990). The commission must meet both prongs of this test for information to be excepted under 552.103(a).

In this case, we conclude that the commission reasonably anticipates litigation relating to Mr. Thompson's employment. We agree that the submitted documents relate to the reasonably anticipated litigation. Therefore, the commission may withhold the documents from disclosure under section 552.103(a). In reaching this conclusion, however, we assume that the opposing party in the litigation has not previously had access to the records at issue; absent special circumstances, once information has been obtained by all parties to the litigation, e.g., through discovery or otherwise, no section 552.103(a) interest exists with respect to that information. Open Records Decision Nos. 349 (1982), 320 (1982). We also note that the applicability of section 552.103(a) ends once the litigation has concluded. Attorney General Opinion MW-575 (1982); Open Records Decision No. 350 (1982).

We are resolving this matter with an informal letter ruling rather than with a published open records decision. This ruling is limited to the particular records at issue under the facts presented to us in this request and should not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records. If you have questions about this ruling, please contact our office.

Sincerely,

Karen E. Hattaway
Assistant Attorney General
Open Records Division

KEH/ch

Ref: ID# 126874

Encl. Submitted documents

cc: Mr. Steven DeWolf
Bellinger & DeWolf
750 N. St. Paul Street, Suite 900
Dallas, Texas 75201
(w/o enclosures)


 

Footnotes

1. We assume that the "representative sample" of records submitted to this office is truly representative of the requested records as a whole. See Open Records Decision Nos. 499 (1988), 497 (1988). This open records letter does not reach, and therefore does not authorize the withholding of, any other requested records to the extent that those records contain substantially different types of information than that submitted to this office.
 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs